Service
Connect systems without losing control of the data.
Kerah designs the interfaces, data flows and cloud foundations that let systems work together reliably and remain understandable to the organization that owns them.
Who this is for
- CIOs and CTOs consolidating a fragmented system landscape
- Organizations replacing or migrating a platform
- Organizations extending a CRM or ERP they intend to keep
- Teams whose reporting is contested because the underlying data is
- Organizations formalising identity and access across several systems
The problems this addresses
- Information re-entered by hand between systems that were never connected
- An ERP or CRM that holds the authoritative record and cannot be reached by anything else
- Reporting that requires archaeology before anyone will act on it
- Integrations that fail silently and are discovered days later
- A retry that quietly creates a duplicate record or a second transaction
- Cloud spend nobody can attribute to a system or a team
What changes
- Information is entered once and flows where it is needed
- Reporting draws on a source the organization has agreed to trust
- Failures are visible when they happen, with a defined response
- Access is governed centrally rather than per system
- The organization can leave any platform it has introduced
What Kerah can deliver
Capability, not a claim of past work. Final scope is established through discovery.
- API design and systems integration
- CRM and ERP integration, extension and data migration
- Identity and single sign-on integration
- Cloud architecture and deployment foundations in your own tenancy
- Data mapping, migration and reconciliation
- Operational data models
- Dashboards and business intelligence
- Event-driven workflows
- Logging, observability and cost visibility
- Backup and recovery design
- Documentation and exit planning
What you receive
Artefacts, not activities. Each one is something you can hold, read or run after the engagement.
- Integration and interface specifications
- Data mapping and migration record
- Infrastructure defined as code
- Monitoring, alerting and dashboards
- Reconciliation reporting
- Runbooks for failure and recovery
- Exit plan for every platform introduced
How the engagement runs
- Design for the failure case
- An integration is specified by what it does when the other system is unavailable, slow or wrong — not only by the successful path.
- Idempotency by default
- Retries are inevitable. Interfaces are designed so that a repeated message cannot double-post, double-charge or duplicate a record.
- Reconcile, then trust
- Migrated and synchronised data is proven with a reconciliation the organization can run itself, before anything depends on it.
Commercial shape. A project for a defined integration or migration, or a retainer where interfaces need continuous stewardship.
Raised from the start, not before launch
Architecture, security and data decisions that are cheap to make early and expensive to retrofit.
How Kerah approaches security- Data classification, and where each class of data is permitted to reside
- Behaviour when a dependency is unavailable, not only when it works
- Idempotency and replay safety on every write interface
- Which system holds the authoritative record for each entity, and which ones follow it
- Secret management, rotation and least privilege
- Cost visibility attributed per system
- A documented exit from every platform introduced during the engagement
Where this stops
- Kerah does not resell cloud capacity, hosting or infrastructure, and does not act as a managed infrastructure provider.
- Systems are deployed into the client's own cloud tenancy, under the client's own accounts, keys and billing. The tenancy is never held in Kerah's name.
- Data residency and regulatory compliance positions are defined with your legal advisers. Kerah implements the decision; it does not certify it.
- Where a platform's own tooling is the right answer, Kerah will say so rather than build an alternative.
Other services
Discovery and Architecture
A documented blueprint with a target architecture, a permission and data-role map, a phased roadmap and a scope you can approve, price or decline on evidence.
Enterprise Systems
One operational system where work is assigned, decisions are recorded, permissions are explicit and reporting comes from the same data people work in.
Digital Product Engineering
A designed, accessible product with a secure back end, built around the tasks people actually perform and measured after release.
AI and Intelligent Automation
A bounded use case with defined success criteria, evaluation against representative cases, human review where it matters, and a fallback when the model is unavailable.
Managed Evolution
A defined support and release model with security maintenance, an owned backlog and a roadmap reviewed on a set cadence.
Security and Privacy Engineering
A system whose access model, data inventory, encryption, logging and deletion behaviour were designed together — and the documentation an assessor asks for, produced as delivery output rather than reconstructed afterwards.
Quality, Testing and Accessibility
A system tested in both languages by people who read both, measured against WCAG 2.2 AA, and exercised under realistic load and failure conditions before launch rather than after it.
Discuss an integration.
Tell us what is not working today, who it affects and what a better outcome would change.